May 17. The Chicago Media Future Conference will be held Saturday, June 13 at Columbia College’s Film Row Cinema (1104 S. Wabash) from 1:30pm to 4:45pm. It follows February’s Chicago Journalism Town Hall, which “brought tremendous energy, intellectual curiosity and talent together in one room.”
From what I can see, the February Town Hall and the June Conference have common concerns:
- The future of traditional news reporting in an age of interactive digital media.
- The employment futures of reporters and other media pros who are losing jobs in droves following the bankruptcies of Chicago’s two daily newspapers, the Tribune and the Sun-Times (not to mention the woes at The Reader and Pioneer Press).
Here are the two panels and the lineup for the June 13 Conference:
Panel 1: How do people consume the news, and what do they do with it?
Andrew Huff; Editor and Publisher of Gapers Block
Amanda Maurer; Social Media Producer, Chicago Tribune
Rich Gordon; Medill Readership Institute; Director of Digital Technology in Education, Medill School at Northwestern
Moderator – Dan Sinker, Columbia College professor, founder of Punk Planet
Panel 2: How do you make money selling the news and who is willing to pay for it?
Patrick Spain; CEO, Newser
Brad Flora; Publisher and Founder, The Windy Citizen
Steve Rhodes; Founder, The Beachwood Reporter
Tom Lynch; Director of Client Satisfaction at IMP!
Moderator – Barbara Iverson, Columbia College professor, Co-publisher, ChicagoTalks
My take on Jon Marshall’s comments on the February Town Hall was that journalists have yet to see the opportunities that interactive media will offer at some point down the road: perhaps as soon as a year or two. Seeing the future that will rise from the ashes of traditional, top-down expert-to-layman journalism admittedly requires something of a quantum leap. I see it as focused less on journalism that informs passive readers in the style of traditional newspapers than on journalism that helps readers – active users of interactive media – make informed decisions on the issues that affect their lives. Net 2.0 social networking sites are full of people making informal (but mostly non-monetized) information exchanges and deals of this sort with each other. So as I see it, the reporter/reader relationship of the future will be more of a two-way info exchange and less of a one-way journalist to reader info transfer.
How can journalists can monetize their skills in this new environment? Fair question. I took a stab at this question here, a couple posts ago.
Perhaps I should say I know no one who sees future as I do, even though I’ve been thinking along the lines of a problem-solving civic medai since the early 1990’s.